Hadrius and Greenboard help your team do compliance faster. Neither was built to inventory, guardrail, and log the AI agents that can now touch your firm and client accounts. That’s the gap examiners are about to ask about — and the gap Artha closes.
20 minutes · no pitch deck · keep your current tools — we cover the layer they don’t.
Hadrius and Greenboard automate the compliance work your team already does. Artha supervises the AI agents themselves. Here is the same capability set, side by side.
| Capability | Hadrius | Greenboard | Artha |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automates compliance work itself (filings, marketing review, archiving) | ✓ | ✓ | — |
| Inventories every AI agent that can touch firm or client accounts | — | — | ✓ |
| Checks each agent action against your policies before it executes | — | — | ✓ |
| Human-in-the-loop approval gates for sensitive agent actions | — | — | ✓ |
| Tamper-evident, hash-chained audit log of agent decisions | — | — | ✓ |
| Answers “how do you supervise AI agents with account access?” | — | — | ✓ |
| Built for the FINRA 2026 AI-agent oversight considerations | — | — | ✓ |
Not either/or. Most firms keep their compliance-automation tool and add Artha as the supervision layer over the AI agents that tool — and everything else — can’t see.
How Artha sits alongside the compliance tools you already use.
No. Hadrius and Greenboard automate compliance tasks — filings, marketing review, archiving, surveillance. Artha supervises the AI agents that can touch your firm or client accounts. Most firms run both: keep the automation tool, add Artha as the supervision layer over the agents.
Every AI agent and MCP connection scoped to your accounts — owner, model, broker, and the exact accounts it can reach. Each intended action is checked against your guardrails (notional caps, restricted lists, trading hours, account scope) before it executes, and sensitive actions are held for documented human approval.
Examiners can now ask how your firm supervises AI agents with access to client accounts, under FINRA’s 2026 Oversight Report and the SEC’s 2026 examination priorities. Artha produces the artifact that answers that question — a tamper-evident, hash-chained audit log you can export in one click.
No. The fixed-fee Exam-Readiness Assessment gives your CCO a defensible AI supervision program — agent inventory, gap analysis, WSP language, and a guardrail spec — with no software to install. Continuous Agent Monitoring is the optional control plane for firms that want ongoing, automated supervision.
Never. Artha observes and gates — it inventories, checks, holds, and logs agent actions. It does not execute trades or touch order flow.
Pick a time below. We’ll walk through what examiners are asking, where your firm stands today, and whether the assessment is worth it for you.
Prefer not to use the scheduler? Open it in a new tab or email parth@tryartha.com.